This annual report describes FHFA's accomplishments, as well as challenges, the agency faced in meeting the strategic goals and objectives during the past fiscal year.
Read about the agency’s 2019 examinations of Fannie Mac, Freddie Mac and the Home Loan Bank System.
Submit comments and provide input on FHFA Rules Open for Comment by clicking on Rulemaking and Federal Register.
Implement critical reforms that will produce a stronger and more resilient housing finance system.
FOSTER competitive, liquid, efficient, and resilient (CLEAR) national housing finance markets that support sustainable homeownership and affordable rental housing; OPERATE in a safe and sound manner appropriate for entities in conservatorship; and PREPARE for eventual exits from the conservatorships.
2019 Conservatorships Strategic Plan
FHFA experts provide reliable data, including all states, about activity in the U.S. mortgage market through its House Price Index, Refinance Report, Foreclosure Prevention Report, and Performance Report.
FHFA economists and policy experts provide reliable research and policy analysis about critical topics impacting the nation’s housing finance sector. Meet the experts...
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac buy single-family mortgages from mortgage companies, commercial banks, credit unions, and other financial institutions. In most cases, a lender receives mortgage-backed securities (MBS) in exchange for the loans.
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac guarantee the payment of principal and interest on their MBS and charges a fee for providing that guarantee. The guarantee fee (g-fee), covers projected credit losses from borrower defaults over the life of the loans, administrative costs, and a return on capital.
Lender guarantee fee payments generally take the form of ongoing monthly payments and frequently also include an upfront payment at the time of Enterprise loan acquisition. A lender typically passes through to the borrower the cost of an upfront fee in the form of a slightly higher interest rate on the mortgage, since borrowers tend to choose not to pay points. Ongoing fees are also included in the interest rate charged to the borrower.
Therefore, as a practical matter, whether Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac charge guarantee fees to lenders as ongoing fees or upfront fees typically makes no difference to borrowers.
Section 1601 of the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (HERA) requires us to conduct an ongoing study of the guarantee fees charged by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and to submit annual reports to Congress, based on aggregated data collected from the Enterprises, regarding the amount of such fees and the criteria used by the Enterprises to determine them.
In December 2011, Congress directed FHFA in the Temporary Payroll Tax Cut Continuation Act of 2011 to increase the guarantee fees Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac charge lenders on single-family mortgages by at least an average of 10 basis points.
To fulfill that mandate, FHFA directed Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to raise guarantee fees by 10 basis points beginning in April 2012. Unlike other single-family guarantee fees, which are retained by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the proceeds from this fee increase are remitted to the Treasury at the end of each quarter.
In August 2012, FHFA directed Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to make more changes to the single-family guarantee fees they charge lenders. The changes became fully effective in December 2012, and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac keep the resulting revenues.
Increased guarantee fees on single-family mortgages by an additional 10 basis points on average.
Made the guarantee fees the Enterprises charge lenders that deliver small and large volumes of loans more uniform.
Began to address the issue of lower-risk loans subsidizing the pricing of higher-risk loans.
In September 2012, we solicited public input via a
Federal Register notice on September 25, 2012 on a proposal to impose an up-front fee on newly acquired single-family mortgages originated in specific states where Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are likely to incur default-related losses much higher than the national average because of the individual laws in those states.
FHFA received more than 60 responses from state and local government officials, interest groups, academics, and the public.
FHFA evaluated public input and determined not to proceed with this initiative at this time.
Read the latest reports:
Single Family Guarantee Fee Reports and
State-Level Guarantee Fee Analysis.
On December 9, 2013, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) announced proposed increases to guarantee fees (g-fees) that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (the Enterprises) charge lenders. The Enterprises receive these fees in return for providing a credit guarantee to ensure the timely payment of principal and interest to investors in Mortgage Backed Securities (MBS) if the borrower fails to pay. The MBS, in turn, are backed by mortgages that lenders sell to the Enterprises.
The proposed changes included an across-the-board 10 basis point increase, an adjustment of up-front fees charged to borrowers in different risk categories and elimination of the 25 basis point Adverse Market Charge for all but four states. On January 8, 2014, Director Melvin L. Watt suspended implementation of these changes pending further review. As part of that review, FHFA solicited input on guarantee fees. Deadline for input closed September 8, 2014.
The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) has completed a comprehensive review of the agency’s policy for guarantee fees charged by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (the Enterprises). FHFA’s review considered multiple factors, including responses to the agency’s June 2014 request for public input, analyses by housing finance market participants of the implied guarantee fee pricing from the Enterprises’ credit risk transfers, and internal analyses of Enterprise pricing, credit guarantee loss data, and modeling.
FHFA’s review focused on reaching an appropriate balance between FHFA’s statutory obligations to: 1) ensure the safety and soundness of the Enterprises, and 2) foster a liquid national housing finance market. In light of this balance, FHFA determined, based on both internal and external analysis, that the current average level of guarantee fees appropriately reflects the current costs and risks associated with providing the Enterprises’ credit guarantee.
As a result, FHFA finds no compelling economic reason to change the general level of fees. FHFA, however, is making certain minor and targeted fee adjustments. To implement these decisions, the agency is directing the Enterprises to make changes to their guarantee fees that will slightly reduce, maintain, or increase costs for different categories of loans. Since all of the guarantee fee changes are small, the agency does not expect the adjustments to cause any material changes to the Enterprises’ loan volume in any of the loan categories and expects the small changes to be revenue neutral.
FHFA Issues 2016 Report to Congress on Guarantee Fees (10/17/2017)
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Single-Family Guarantee Fees in 2016 (10/17/2017)
Date last updated: 10/17/2017
© 2020 Federal Housing Finance Agency